Skip to content

Alaska…learning the wrong lessons

December 4, 2013

P.1The state government of Alaska must be taking lessons from our national government on how to balance its budget. (Alaska Dispatch 11/03/2013) — “It has gone almost unnoticed in Alaska, but in a three-year period, the state has said so long to billion-dollar surpluses and hello to billion-dollar deficits. The big cut in oil taxes and the continued decline in North Slope oil production are catching up with us. By one measure, the state deficit is already at $959.5 million, the difference between the spring revenue forecast of $6.2 billion and the budget of $7.1 billion. The Legislative Finance Division calls this the “projected pre-transfer fiscal deficit,” to be covered by moving money out of savings accounts.”

And all Alaskans know what this means, our representatives in Juneau will dip into our states savings so they can continue to spend more than they take in. If this sounds familiar we don’t have to look farther than our representatives in Washington when they first ‘borrowed’ money from the social security trust fund to finance any and all projects. Now with the social security fund empty they just ignore the deficit and continue to spend by just printing more money. Fortunately or maybe unfortunately our representatives in Juneau can’t just print money to cover expenses.

Karen Rehfeld the state budget director said the withdrawal of $374 million from one of the savings accounts should not count as deficit spending because that account was set aside for capital projects funded in the budget, such as work on an in-state gas line. I would argue that for the average Alaskan, it counts because it is an example of taking money out of our savings to fund the budget.

FYI…In a state finance committee meeting it was noted that by 2022, public employees retirement system, public schools and Medicaid will take up 94% of the states budget, leaving virtually no money for the capital budget or anything else.

It looks like the people we voted to represent us in Juneau
are no different than those we put in power in Washington.

How hard is it to understand you can not spend more than you take in?

3 Comments leave one →
  1. December 4, 2013 2:44 pm

    No matter how the justify themselves, they are overspending. How many of those projects are truly needed? How many are to make their political contributors happy and look good on the politicians’ resume’s when they try going on to Washington, since they already know how to spend more than they take in? Just what we need. Palin got us on track to stay within our budget, but almost any housewife knows how to do that, Parnell has pissed it away and then some. Way to go, Parnell. The oil companies really needed those tax breaks.


  2. December 5, 2013 1:29 am

    Ugh…at some point “we the people” will be paying the piper. I know a lot of people already are with the reductions in public services, etc. But this can’t go on forever. Can it????


  3. December 31, 2013 11:09 am

    Seems likely folks will vote the spenders in until the benefits of that spending stop arriving, right? Wonder how many voters will be living in Alaska a year or so after that happens…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: